|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Lord Zim
787
   |
Posted - 2012.06.12 05:40:00 -
[1] - Quote
Gevlon Goblin wrote:@Giznitt: Safe corp: no towers, same missioning tax as an NPC corp
You want "safe"? Stay in your NPC corp.
Gevlon Goblin wrote:Can you give any sensible reason why would a real newbie spend his time and very limited resources with suicide-ganking? I'd say every 1-month old suicide ganker is a throwaway recruit-a-friend account for a bored vet.
Yes: it's fun.
Gevlon Goblin wrote:Why SHOULD you get insurance if you jump on a drake and the drake wins? I mean do you consider it fair to be PAID to pick a fight and suck in it?
Hey, I have a better idea, let's remove insurance in its entirety.
Gevlon Goblin wrote:@Disdaine: griefing is shooting someone without significant ingame gain. Aka "for tears"
Last I checked, griefing was going after one player in particular, or going after newbies in starter systems. Scamming some random idiot or ganking a random hulk isn't automatically griefing in the "we'll ban you" way, it's part and parcel of how EVE works. |
Lord Zim
787
|
Posted - 2012.06.12 05:46:00 -
[2] - Quote
Also heh "CCP SHALL NOT REMOVE PLEX". That's funny. I'm sure that demand'll go down well. |
Lord Zim
788
|
Posted - 2012.06.12 13:43:00 -
[3] - Quote
Gevlon Goblin wrote:Highsec hold 80% of the players.
I just noticed this. I have 3 accounts, 2 of my characters are in nullsec, the rest are in hisec doing various things.
80% of the accounts may stay in hisec, it's not 80% of the players though. |
Lord Zim
789
|
Posted - 2012.06.12 18:47:00 -
[4] - Quote
sabre906 wrote:Confirming that all my disposable scout/cyno alts are in highsec, doing... what exactly?  Non-playing disposable alts are placed where your actual characters don't want to be - that would be lowsec, not highsec or null.
I don't know about you, but I do considerable business in hisec when I'm not in a fleet in null. This includes watching prices in a lot of market hubs etc. |
Lord Zim
792
|
Posted - 2012.06.13 21:49:00 -
[5] - Quote
I'm sure there's supposed to be a point there, somewhere, in that post. |
Lord Zim
848
|
Posted - 2012.06.20 10:11:00 -
[6] - Quote
Ribikoka wrote:Big 0.0 alliances easily can put their m8s to CSM member positions, and the splitted high sec community can't do this. But not much can be done about it.
Not much can be done except stopping being so defeatist and not being so bad at organizing yourselves. You people keep claiming that 75% of all characters live in hisec, it really shouldn't be all that hard to find even just one candidate (which isn't xenuria-level weirdola), and push him forth to "hisec saviour fame". |
Lord Zim
849
|
Posted - 2012.06.20 11:44:00 -
[7] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:Lady Katherine Devonshire wrote:While I agree that most of these, ahem "demands" are pretty silly, I also agree that there really is no voice for hisec players. I remember the last CSM election and not seeing any candidate who wasn't ultimately just a lobbyist for one nullsec alliance or another.
Which nullsec alliance was Issler Dainze mouthpiecing for?
Goons. Obviously. The wardec and the hilarious alliance mail was just to throw people off. |
Lord Zim
1094
|
Posted - 2012.07.24 23:22:00 -
[8] - Quote
Victory for botters. Yay for making mining ice or ore not worth the time of day again. Woo. |
Lord Zim
1097
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 10:17:00 -
[9] - Quote
The botting macks/hulks will be in NPC corps, so no, there won't be wardecs. |
|
|
| |
|